Posts Tagged ‘discovery’

The Lincoln Repository is in ‘Find it at Lincoln’

Posted on June 19th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

Publication records from the Lincoln Repository now form part of the Library’s new discovery service, Find it at Lincoln. The Repository is the first of the University of Lincoln’s library collections to be made available in the new service. New and updated records are harvested from the Repository every week for inclusion in Find it at Lincoln using the OAI-PMH protocol for sharing data between repository systems.

Please note: Find it at Lincoln is very much still in development at present. No guarantees are made about the current look/feel, features or behaviour of the system – results may vary!

To search the new service for Repository content:

  • Log in to Find it at Lincoln here;
  • Select “Search Options” from beneath the search box;
  • Scroll down and tick the box marked “Institutional Repository Only”;
  • Enter your search term(s) in the search box and hit “Search”.
    Screenshot of Find it at Lincoln

Alternatively, try this example search for Repository records matching the subject term biolog*, or this link to a sample Repository publication record within Find it at Lincoln.

Screenshot of Find it at Lincoln              Screenshot of Find it at Lincoln

The Lincoln Repository exists for the permanent deposit of research and conference papers, e-theses, student projects and teaching and learning materials produced by the community of staff and students at the University of Lincoln.

Please note: Find it at Lincoln is very much still in development at present. No guarantees are made about the current look/feel, features or behaviour of the system – results may vary!

I Am Collecting A Collection

Posted on May 31st, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

As part of the setup process for our forthcoming EBSCO Discovery Service (“Find it at Lincoln”), we’ve been rationalising the location and collection codes which display on our library catalogue (HiP). These will be harvested and used by EBSCO to allow users to limit searches of our printed/ebook holdings to particular collections, as well as to modify and limit searches using facets. (Explanation of faceted search here. Screenshot of EDS showing search facets here.)

The location and collection codes/labels used in HiP had drifted over the years. Many of them were redundant, there was the odd item assigned to a rogue collection, and some of the language was out-of-date. This has all now been brought into line. We have 4 locations, and 32 unique location:collection combinations.

Screenshot of the library catalogue showing locations and collections

Here is an updated list of all of our collections.

Location: GCW University Library

  1. Abstracts & Indexes
  2. Audio-visual Collection
  3. Complementary Medicine Clinic – a collection of books which isn’t actually held in the Library…
  4. Dissertations – for historical reasons, actually in a separate location, “GCW University Library (Core)”
  5. Ebooks – all ebooks are notionally located in the main GCW University Library*
  6. Historical Resources – I’ve no idea what this is…
  7. Journals
  8. Law Library
  9. Local History Collection
  10. Main Collection
  11. Maps
  12. Maths & Statistics Room – small collection of reference books on the ground floor
  13. Microform
  14. Oversize Collection
  15. Zibby Garnett Library – our rare books room; c.f. the Zibby Garnett Fellowship
  16. (Please ask at the library desk) – a catch-all label for various closed collections and odd things—SPSS CDs, off-prints, etc.—held in filing cabinets

Location: Theology Reading Room

  1. Main Collection

Location: Riseholme Park Campus Library

  1. Audio-visual Collection
  2. Journals
  3. Main Collection
  4. Reference Collection
  5. Special Collection (Riseholme Park) – historical and rare books, mainly agriculture and biology
  6. (Please ask at the library desk)

Location: Hull Campus Library

  1. Audio-visual Collection
  2. Dissertations
  3. Journals
  4. Main Collection

Location: Holbeach Campus Library

  1. Audio-visual Collection
  2. Dissertations
  3. Main Collection
  4. Reference Collection
  5. (Please ask at the library desk)

*I know, this doesn’t make much sense.

EBSCO information day / Discovery update

Posted on May 24th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

I was south of the river (Thames, not Witham) yesterday for an EBSCO information day. As I blogged recently, we’ve just signed up for the EBSCO Discovery Service (which we’re branding as “Find it @ Lincoln“). A couple of useful things came out of the event:

Elsewhere, Chris Leach and I have been making some changes to Horizon/HiP, to enable us to get our catalogue records and holdings represented in Find it @ Lincoln, as well as within our new reading lists system (more about which soon).

In particular:

  1. All MARC records in the catalogue now include the internal Horizon bibliographic record number, in field 999$a.
    Screenshot of a MARC record
  2. This MARC field has been mapped to a new searchable index in HiP (with the code .BI), e.g. http://www.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ipac20/ipac.jsp?index=.BI&term=134439
  3. Finally, records can now be retrieved by searching by this bib number over Z39.50. It’s also now possible to search for and retrieve records by ISBN/ISSN over Z39.50.

On open data licensing and sustainability

Posted on May 17th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp
Last week I attended a free ‘licensing clinic‘ in Birmingham, organised by the Discovery programme – mainly as a means of kick-starting my brain into considering the copyright/licensing issues around the CLOCK project. Here are my notes.
  1. The Jerome project addressed licensing in April, 2011, and the situation hasn’t really changed for us: we’re still intending to expose as much of our bibliographic data as possible using a properly open licence such as CC0.
    • “The licensing of data is an interesting one, since we run into a whole bunch of questions around who actually owns the information in our catalogue. Since it’s all factual information (and you can’t copyright a fact) then surely it’s a free for all – except that EU law introduces a curve ball in the form of database right. Broadly speaking this provides specific protection for collections of records, but not the records themselves.”
  2. Ed Chamberlain and the COMET project also addressed licensing and the ownership of MARC records: work that we should revisit.
  3. The JISC Open Bibliographic Data Guide (obd.jisc.ac.uk) provides very clear advice and information useful in creating an open data business case. E.g.:
    • “[…]if we presume that the rationale for publication is to ensure the widest possible dissemination then adoption of a generic open data license (such as Open Data Commons or CC0) is the most effective way to make the set of potential uses unambiguous. Restrictive licenses are counter-productive[…]“
  4. There is some very helpful guidance coming out of the Discovery project around building a business case for open discovery. This was summarised at the recent Discovery programme meeting (also in Birmingham) by David Kay –
    • N.B. I’ll revisit this in a future blog post. I’m getting almost surprisingly interested in the problem of ‘selling’ the idea of open bib data to an institution, and I’ve found the Discovery work on business cases increasingly useful.
  5. At Lincoln in March, 2012, we had a very useful visit from Sander van der Waal of OSS Watch where we discussed the University of Lincoln’s approach to openness (Open Source, Open Access, as well as Open Data). Joss Winn is following this work up with the University’s IP manager with a view to writing a University policy on open licensing of our IP.
  6. Related to the ‘business case’ aspect is the work of LNCD (and also discussions I’ve had with Ed Chamberlain recently) about how to ensure sustainability of open services in a technical sense – what sort of systems architecture and processes do we need in place, and how do we work with university ICT support departments to ensure that projects become institutionally-supported services when it’s important for them to do so?
  7. At this, Birmingham event, Chris Banks of the University of Aberdeen presented about the benefits and challenges of sharing from a library director’s perspective. I was particularly interested in the metaphor of “metadata as currency”: how are aggregators creating value based on the mass accumulation of metadata, and how are they selling that value back to libraries? See Chris’s blog for more. Aberdeen are clearly doing a lot around the analysis of e-resources usage and relating it back to their library strategy / information literacy, etc.
  8. Paul Miller (Cloud of Data): one key quote “amateurs tend to do a better job of aggregating content than institutions” (e.g. collections of images on Flickr). This may be in part because individuals don’t have the same risk-averse approach, but whatever the reason
  9. Barrister Frances Davey gave us a quick run-through of IP law as it relates to data. Key quote: “the legal repercussions of publishing data openly are pretty much nil“. Fear and uncertainty poisons initiative! Frances also touched on the business / reputation-management arguments for having an active approach to open data: people might well be getting bad copies of your data already (via screenscraping) – release it yourself and take control of the quality. Example of the British Library choosing a CC0 licence precisely because of the lack of an attribution clause – then any subsequent re-use is “nothing more to do with us”.
  10. Then, after lunch, copyright consultant Naomi Korn ran a workshop on the practical aspects of choosing a licence for your data. Naomi spoke about the need to start by deciding how open you want to be as an institution (noting that institutions with a dedicated © person tend to have a greater appetite for risk) – then consider whether you have the resources in place to get where you want to be. Key quote: “Let’s do some attribution mapping!” Some link from Naomi’s workshop:
  11. At the Birmingham clinic we also discussed the risks (including the risk of doing nothing) and benefits of taking an open approach. My contribution: open bibliographic data enables high-level services to be sold back to universities (c.f. Chris Banks’ notes on metadata aggregation, above). We shouldn’t be scared of this or see it as a reason to not open up our data (we can’t compete with those companies; we want their services and we’re prepared to pay for them!); but we can build lower-level, locally-relevant services as a result of releasing our own open data, and play on the web by web rules – if we don’t make our data open for re-use on the web, we can’t even have the conversation. Lincoln’s approach is entirely around open data as a means to an end: it’s the best and most natural way of sparking off new, innovative services based on unexpected combinations of our own and other people’s data.
    • The best example of this so far are the new data-driven staff profiles at Lincoln: but we’re going to need more and more convincing examples if we’re going to make a convincing business case.
  12. Final overall quote of the day: “Writing your own open licence is an unpleasant form of vanity“.

Find it @ Lincoln: looking forward to a new EBSCO discovery service in the Library

Posted on May 11th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

Following long, looong discussions, we have finally chosen a next-generation library discovery service for the University of Lincoln Library.

After reviewing the four major commercially-available discovery products (from EBSCO, Ex Libris, OCLC and Serials Solutions), and after making several reference visits to see the various products in action in UK university libraries…

(…drum roll…)

EDS logo…we decided upon, and have now bought access to, the EBSCO Discovery Service. Over the summer we’ll be configuring and testing the new system, and in September 2012 it’ll be launched as the new front-end search and discovery platform for the Library at the University of Lincoln.

This new service will provide a single point of search and discovery across nearly all of the Library’s collections, including our ‘traditional’ library catalogue, e-books & e-journals, the Lincoln Repository, archives & special collections, reading lists, and a wide range of specialist and general electronic databases. (N.B. it might not search all of these collections right from day one!) We hope that—along with some of the other new and improved services that are being introduced as part of the Library’s review of ICT systems—it will make it significantly easier and more straightforward to find and use the University’s library resources.

According to the SCONUL HE Library Technology wiki, the EBSCO Discovery Service is also used by:

We decided that EBSCO Discovery Service provided us with a familiar (yet flexible, powerful and ‘serious’) research interface, as well as a good fit with our existing and planned electronic database collections. We were also influenced by EBSCO’s plans to develop and integrate the A-to-Z e-journals knowledgebase and link resolver into the discovery environment.

We’ll be spending the next month or so configuring the system to search all of our collections, designing/branding the interface, training library staff, and working with other University departments on getting the most out of the new tools. We anticipate that early access to the system will be possible from the end of July onwards (though this is subject to change), with a ‘soft’ launch in time for student induction in September, and a formal launch/discovery party with free coffee for all, later in the year.

We have also decided that the service will be branded under the title “Find it @ Lincoln“. (Eagle-eyed readers will spot that this is the name we’ve been using for a while for our EBSCO LinkSource OpenURL link resolver.) Information about the new Find it @ Lincoln service, and about the project to develop and launch it at the University of Lincoln, will soon be available at: http://findit.library.lincoln.ac.uk/

I’d like to thank the staff of all four discovery software companies, for all the presentations, demonstrations & visits, for the information they made available to the University of Lincoln over the past few months about their products, and for the demonstrations and supporting materials they provided which were of such use in informing this first selection phase of our discovery project.

Many thanks also, to the several universities who received staff from Library for discovery-themed visits, and who patiently described their use of their own search tools and answered our many questions profound and otherwise.

Now watch this space :-)

Imminent domain

Posted on May 4th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

With various new services arising out of the ongoing Library ICT systems review, we’re amassing a nice little collection of library-related 2nd-level subdomains. Here’s a list, which I’ll edit as they become live.

  1. http://library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (i.e. the ‘bare’ library subdomain: this isn’t used at the moment, but we intend that it will become the Library’s ‘root’ web presence)
  2. http://www.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (currently used for our SirsiDynix Horizon Information Portal OPAC, which we intend to move to catalogue.library… in order to free up www for our web pages hosted on WordPress)
  3. http://catalogue.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (the future home of the library catalogue)
  4. http://catalog.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (an alternative/US spelling of catalogue)
  5. http://findit.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (a launch point for our new Discovery system, still to be announced, and with a name yet to be decided!)
  6. http://lists.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (Talis Aspire reading lists, currently being developed)
  7. http://archives.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (Axiell Calm archives and special collections software)
  8. http://jerome.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (Jerome is our innovation platform and a home for experimental search services, being re-developed as part of the CLOCK project)
  9. http://auth.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (OpenAthens LA v2.1 authentication software)
  10. http://proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (EZProxy authentication software)
  11. http://guides.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ (LibGuides software)

We also have two core systems which aren’t on the library subdomain:

  1. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/ (the Lincoln Repository on EPrints – it’s appropriate that this isn’t on library, as we’ve always managed the Repository as a shared/collaborative project between CERD, ICT services, the Library, and the Research Office)
  2. http://ill.lincoln.ac.uk/ (CLIO inter-library loans software)

Latest steps in defining the business case for resource discovery

Posted on April 12th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

A quote from me on p.1 of the latest Discovery newsletter (April 2012), after the recent ‘Better Resource Discovery – Is there a business case?‘ workshop.

A similar user-centred approach is the driver at University of Lincoln, as explained by Paul Stainthorp, Electronic Resources Librarian: “We see the role of the student as collaborator in the production of knowledge and focus on improving the student experience through their active engagement.” Lincoln has an open development group which is committed to exposing library and other institutional data through APIs as the basis for agile and innovative development. “We are starting to see the results in terms of new cataloguing workflows, knowledge share, staff development, and new partnerships.”

Clunky business: making an institutional case for library discovery

Posted on March 23rd, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

I’m in London today for a workshop bringing together people from the JISC/SCONUL Discovery initiative and the JISC/SCONUL shared services programme, on this topic:

‘Better Resource Discovery – Is there a business case?’

An exploratory workshop to identify business cases for new modes of resource discovery based on real service drivers

David Kay from SERO asked me to talk for 10 minutes on Lincoln’s approach to open bibliographic data and open discovery; what our ‘business case’ might be; what we’re doing to put it into practice; and how the institution might become aware of and judge our success.

‘Business case’ isn’t a phase that falls from my lips naturally… however: I am uneasy about our getting too comfortable under a protective ‘shield’ of (mainly JISC-funded) project-based development: it may protect us from a large amount of flak, and provides us with an enviable amount of freedom, but by definition it’s only there temporarily.

We need to build ourselves some new shields – perhaps ones less impregnable, but ones that are more persistent and less easily dissipated once projects ends. And to do that, we need to create more useful, disruptive institutional services like this one. Our business case is ‘being a university‘; how do we create convincing applications from open tools and data that further that business?

My slides are on Google Docs.

Tick tock we don’t stop. Introducing CLOCK, a new JISC-funded resource discovery project at the universities of Lincoln and Cambridge

Posted on December 10th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Cambridge CLOCKThe title says it all, really. The University of Lincoln, working in consortium with Cambridge University Library and Owen Stephens Consulting, has been awarded £49,877 by JISC to investigate ways of driving innovation in libraries’ interactions with Open Bibliographic Data, through a project we’re calling CLOCK (Cambridge-Lincoln Open Catalogue Knowledgebase).

CLOCK is a continuation of and elaboration upon the work of two recent JISC Discovery projects—Jerome at the University of Lincoln and COMET at the University of Cambridge—via a programme of development work shared between the two institutions, and with library consultant Owen Stephens. JISC were impressed enough with the work of both projects, and sufficiently interested in the potential for collaboration, that they encouraged our joint bid for follow-up funding.

Between now and the end of July, 2012, the CLOCK project will provide us with a framework to:

…[1] exploit through real-world applications the significant amount of data released openly by Cambridge University Library; [2] apply the Jerome database architecture, iterative development methodology, and API framework to a bibliographic dataset an order of magnitude greater than the University of Lincoln’s; and [3] to build and enable a new set of tools and demonstrator services which will enable the future development of public Open Bib Data web applications of practical utility to libraries and end-users.

You can read the full bid document, here.

I’m very much looking forward to working with Ed Chamberlain, Systems Librarian in the University Library at the University of Cambridge, along with Owen Stephens, veteran of a number of campaigns to open up access to library data, and Chris Leach (Systems Librarian) and Ian Snowley (University Librarian) from the University of Lincoln. Thanks are due to all of them for their help in writing the successful bid; to the Research & Enterprise Development office at Lincoln for their invaluable assistance in putting together the project budget; and to the LNCD group at the University of Lincoln for providing the kind of supportive development platform that makes these kind of projects possible.

Finally, a big thank you to Andy McGregor and the JISC Digital Infrastructure: Information and library infrastructure: Resource discovery programme, for this opportunity to further explore the blossoming environment of open bibliographic data/open discovery in libraries. If you haven’t done so already, you might like to take a look at the following websites:

As with all our projects, we’ll be blogging it comprehensively (so stand by for a steady stream of awful clock-related puns used as blog post titles). Although there’s little to see there yet, the CLOCK project blog is at: http://clock.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/ – along with its own RSS feed RSS feed icon. Watch that space!

It’s the end of Jerome as we know it (but I feel fine)

Posted on November 28th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

The University of Lincoln’s Jerome project finished in August with the successful release of more than 240,000 openly-licensed bibliographic records, available over developer APIs, and a joint hack day with Cambridge University Library‘s COMET project.

Now, encouraged by positive JISC feedback, both institutions—Cambridge and Lincoln jointly—have applied for follow-up project funding under the project title CLOCK. If our bid is successful, the new project will run between December 2011–July 2012, employing a web developer based at the University of Lincoln, and distilling the work of both institutions into the development of new innovative library metadata discovery services for the scholarly community.

You can read the project proposal for CLOCK at http://lncn.eu/ijt4 – the introductory section is below.

The University of Lincoln and Cambridge University Library both delivered successful projects (Jerome and COMET) for the JISC Infrastructure for Resource Discovery Programme in 2011. This is a proposal for the continuation of and elaboration upon the work of both projects, via a programme of development work shared between the two institutions.

Throughout both projects (COMET-Jerome), parallel approaches in technology and data structure were noted and commented upon. A ‘mash day’ workshop event held in Cambridge in August aimed to explore these differences as well as areas of potential synergy. Here project members identified several points of interest to take forward.

Both projects produced outputs of interest to researchers, students, librarians, developers, and designers of bibliographic discovery environments. The CLOCK project will harness the success of these two complementary initiatives and investigate new approaches to data creation and discovery in the library domain. In particular, it will investigate, propose, and develop new, web-based bibliographic tools/APIs which will make it easier for developers, academic libraries and library end-users (esp. researchers) to find Open Bibliographic Data and incorporate that data into systems and workflows.

This project is an opportunity to [1] exploit through real-world applications the significant amount of data released openly by Cambridge University Library; [2] apply the Jerome database architecture, iterative development methodology, and API framework to a bibliographic dataset an order of magnitude greater than the University of Lincoln’s; and [3] to build and enable a new set of tools and demonstrator services which will enable the future development of public Open Bib Data web applications of practical utility to libraries and end-users.

The project will be supported by library consultant Owen Stephens, who will help to put the work into a national context, relating CLOCK to the wider movement toward Open Bib Data and the work of the JISC Discovery initiative. It will take place in an environment (Lincoln/Cambridge) where a culture of developer inquiry and experimentation is encouraged and nurtured. It is also endorsed by senior library management at both universities.

Both universities are involved in complementary development work which will  both inform and be informed by CLOCK: at Cambridge, Ed Chamberlain is guiding the development of the JISC Open Bibliography 2 project; in Lincoln, Paul Stainthorp is lead researcher on the #jiscmrd Orbital project, which is investigating the management of research data, with some areas of overlap.

CLOCK will operate as part of the wider JISC Digital Infrastructure: Information and library infrastructure: Resource discovery, and support the recent concerted effort to move toward openly licensed library discovery in UK Higher Education and beyond.