Posts Tagged ‘phone’

Setting the time (some CLOCK project admin)

Posted on February 2nd, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

Some notes from a phone chat with Andy McGregor (JISC Discovery programme manager) about CLOCK:

  1. Just as we did for Jerome, we’ll be using the CLOCK project blog for all reporting to JISC (as well as for blog posts about the work of the project itself):
    • List of required blog post headings here
  2. We also need to produce a Project Plan, based broadly on our original proposal:
    • Required headings for the Project Plan here
  3. (As project manager) I’ll also be emailing Andy once a month with a quick update on progress;
  4. There are nine other projects in the Discovery phase two programme, plus CLOCK:
    • List of projects here
    • There’s also a mailing list for the programme
  5. The next programme meeting will take place w/c 16 April 2012, in Birmingham:
    • List of programme meetings here
  6. As in phase one, consultants will be preparing case studies on the various projects (CLOCK included) for the benefit of the wider Discovery programme.

Related: we’re planning to hold our first project team meeting on 14 February 2012. To spread the burden of travel equally, we’re going to hold it in a location convenient for Lincoln, Cambridge and the West Midlands…

Peterborough

It’s the end of Jerome as we know it (but I feel fine)

Posted on November 28th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

The University of Lincoln’s Jerome project finished in August with the successful release of more than 240,000 openly-licensed bibliographic records, available over developer APIs, and a joint hack day with Cambridge University Library‘s COMET project.

Now, encouraged by positive JISC feedback, both institutions—Cambridge and Lincoln jointly—have applied for follow-up project funding under the project title CLOCK. If our bid is successful, the new project will run between December 2011–July 2012, employing a web developer based at the University of Lincoln, and distilling the work of both institutions into the development of new innovative library metadata discovery services for the scholarly community.

You can read the project proposal for CLOCK at http://lncn.eu/ijt4 – the introductory section is below.

The University of Lincoln and Cambridge University Library both delivered successful projects (Jerome and COMET) for the JISC Infrastructure for Resource Discovery Programme in 2011. This is a proposal for the continuation of and elaboration upon the work of both projects, via a programme of development work shared between the two institutions.

Throughout both projects (COMET-Jerome), parallel approaches in technology and data structure were noted and commented upon. A ‘mash day’ workshop event held in Cambridge in August aimed to explore these differences as well as areas of potential synergy. Here project members identified several points of interest to take forward.

Both projects produced outputs of interest to researchers, students, librarians, developers, and designers of bibliographic discovery environments. The CLOCK project will harness the success of these two complementary initiatives and investigate new approaches to data creation and discovery in the library domain. In particular, it will investigate, propose, and develop new, web-based bibliographic tools/APIs which will make it easier for developers, academic libraries and library end-users (esp. researchers) to find Open Bibliographic Data and incorporate that data into systems and workflows.

This project is an opportunity to [1] exploit through real-world applications the significant amount of data released openly by Cambridge University Library; [2] apply the Jerome database architecture, iterative development methodology, and API framework to a bibliographic dataset an order of magnitude greater than the University of Lincoln’s; and [3] to build and enable a new set of tools and demonstrator services which will enable the future development of public Open Bib Data web applications of practical utility to libraries and end-users.

The project will be supported by library consultant Owen Stephens, who will help to put the work into a national context, relating CLOCK to the wider movement toward Open Bib Data and the work of the JISC Discovery initiative. It will take place in an environment (Lincoln/Cambridge) where a culture of developer inquiry and experimentation is encouraged and nurtured. It is also endorsed by senior library management at both universities.

Both universities are involved in complementary development work which will  both inform and be informed by CLOCK: at Cambridge, Ed Chamberlain is guiding the development of the JISC Open Bibliography 2 project; in Lincoln, Paul Stainthorp is lead researcher on the #jiscmrd Orbital project, which is investigating the management of research data, with some areas of overlap.

CLOCK will operate as part of the wider JISC Digital Infrastructure: Information and library infrastructure: Resource discovery, and support the recent concerted effort to move toward openly licensed library discovery in UK Higher Education and beyond.

QR codes AWAY!

Posted on July 7th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

It was the annual University of Lincoln Library staff away day on Tuesday. I performed my turn: a 20-minute presentation on QR codes in academic libraries: the culmination of our (JB, PC, CL, MN, PS, EV) little internal mini-project. (There were two other mini research projects which reported on Tuesday: one group looked at improving the student experience; the other at the best ways of promoting new library resources.)

Then we broke off into groups to consider various questions arising out of the work of the project groups. My question was this:

How could we support and encourage the use of mobile devices in the Library?

We talked around this for a while: should we be supporting their use? (We certainly support and encourage the use of desktop PCs as tools for accessing library resources and services: so why not mobiles? Part of the problem, I think, is that we’ve not reconciled our historic library-y attitude to mobile phones with the possibilities of mobile computing. Whatever: we need to come to terms with them once and for all, decide on a position, and stick to it!)

Even given that we should be prepared to support mobile devices: do we need to encourage people to use them in the Library? (People seem to be adopting smartphones perfectly readily without the need for encouragement from libraries…) Perhaps what we need to encourage is not the use of mobile devices per se, but for students and academic staff to re-consider the use of them as valid devices for learning.

We also need to remember that ‘mobile devices’ ≠ just phones, but also mp3 players, tablets (e.g. iPads), e-book readers, netbooks, etc. etc.

After a while, we narrowed it down to six recommendations for the Library: three things we could do now, with no additional money, to support the use of mobile devices – three further things that we can plan to do in the future, which would require a bit of funding.

Do now with no extra money:

  1. Add QR codes to print journal box labels, to link our print holdings to the corresponding e-journal record (c.f. this photo);
  2. ‘Soft launch’ the mobile version of RefWorks (RefMobile) to our users;
  3. Ask colleagues within the Library who are already smartphone enthusiasts (they know who they are!) to demonstrate their toys to the rest of us.

Do in the future with a bit of funding:

  1. Run a marketing campaign to encourage people to re-consider their mobile phone as a useful academic tool (“the classroom in your pocket“?);
  2. Systems development – make sure as many of our systems as possible have a valid mobile user interface, and target development at those systems which are lagging behind;
  3. Purchase tablet devices for library staff to use when ‘roving’: providing support to students away from the help desk (“…you don’t need to log in, I can show you on this!“).

UL telephone extension voodoo

Posted on May 17th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Did you know this? I didn’t. And I’ve worked here for 10 years.

University of Lincoln telephone extension numbers with the format…

…have the following prefix:

7*** 01522 83––––
6*** 01522 88––––
55** 01522 83––––
5*** (except 55**) 01522 89––––
3*** 01406 49–––– (Holbeach)
1*** 01482 31–––– (Hull)

Is that it? Or are there more permutations?