Posts Tagged ‘events’

Slides on the CLOCK project for #Mashcat (Cambridge mashed library cataloguing event)

Posted on July 5th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

Mashcat logoA whole contingent from Lincoln—Andrew Beeken, Trevor Jones, Elif Varol and I—are at the Cambridge University Clinical School at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, for a mashed library event – Mashcat.

Mashcat is “a mashed library event focussing on cataloguing data. For cataloguers, developers and anyone else with an interest in how library catalogue data can be created, manipulated, used and re-used by computers and software”. It’s being sponsored by DevCSI.

We’re presenting about the CLOCK project to a room full of cataloguers. No pressure. The slides are online at: http://lncn.eu/hknp

Talis Aspire User Group (TAUG) newbies’ presentation

Posted on June 29th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

Next week, along with a colleague from the @GCWLibrary, I’m attending a meeting of the Talis Aspire User Group (TAUG) at the University of Derby. As new customers of Talis Aspire (see lists.library.lincoln.ac.uk), we’ve been asked to do a 5-minute, 2-slide “meeting new customers” presentation, covering where we are with our Aspire ‘tenancy’, our experiences, expectations, and any questions we have.

Here are our two slides:

Slides on copyright for #openlincoln

Posted on June 21st, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

I’m doing a ten-minute whistlestop presentation on copyright © and licensed copying for re-use in educational resources, for an event called ’Sharing Practice; open approaches to teaching and learning‘, organised as part of the OER work at the University of Lincoln.

Here are the slides:

EBSCO information day / Discovery update

Posted on May 24th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

I was south of the river (Thames, not Witham) yesterday for an EBSCO information day. As I blogged recently, we’ve just signed up for the EBSCO Discovery Service (which we’re branding as “Find it @ Lincoln“). A couple of useful things came out of the event:

Elsewhere, Chris Leach and I have been making some changes to Horizon/HiP, to enable us to get our catalogue records and holdings represented in Find it @ Lincoln, as well as within our new reading lists system (more about which soon).

In particular:

  1. All MARC records in the catalogue now include the internal Horizon bibliographic record number, in field 999$a.
    Screenshot of a MARC record
  2. This MARC field has been mapped to a new searchable index in HiP (with the code .BI), e.g. http://www.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ipac20/ipac.jsp?index=.BI&term=134439
  3. Finally, records can now be retrieved by searching by this bib number over Z39.50. It’s also now possible to search for and retrieve records by ISBN/ISSN over Z39.50.

Return of the Mash

Posted on April 27th, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

As I write this, there are just 8 tickets left for #Mashcat, the next Mashed Library event taking place on 5 July 2012 in Cambridge (…and the first mashlib since Pancakes and Mash in Lincoln a year ago? – silly me, I forgot about #ChrisMash). Becuse of the topic and the location, this is a particularly interesting one for the CLOCK project. Mashcat is:

A mashed library event focussing on cataloguing data. For cataloguers, developers and anyone else with an interest in how library catalogue data can be created, manipulated, used and re-used by computers and software. It will be an invaluable opportunity for cataloguers, developers and others to meet and share knowledge, thoughts, and ideas. Possible topics participants could explore on the day include the principles behind the data, tools and code for working with it, and real examples of work on bibliographic data.

Mashcat is a free one day event, which is supported by DevCSI. After refreshments, the first session will start at 10am.

For more information, see http://www.mashcat.info, email us at info@mashcat.info, contact @orangeaurochs and follow the hashtag #mashcat on Twitter.

Discovery phase two: programme launch (slides)

Posted on February 2nd, 2012 by Paul Stainthorp

JISC formally launched phase two of the Information and library infrastructure: Resource discovery programme on 11 January 2012 in Birmingham. CLOCK weren’t able to attend in person, but we sent these slides in our absence. They’re good for a quick overview of the aims of the CLOCK project.

#jiscmrd programme launch; day 1 – DCC tools workshop

Posted on December 1st, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

This week sees the formal two-day launch event for the JISC Managing Research Data programme 2011–2013 (the programme which is funding Orbital). It’s being held in the National College for School Leadership, next to the University of Nottingham’s Jubilee Campus.

Unfortunately, after schlepping it from the furthest fringes of Lincolnshire (and then having to go back home for the evening), I was only able to attend a couple of hours of day 1. But it was worth it.

I arrived just in time for a workshop about a number of research data management tools developed/provided by the Digital Curation Centre (DCC). Dr Mansur Darlington, who’s acting as external assessor/consultant to the Orbital project, was also in this workshop and contributed greatly to the discussions. (My Orbital colleagues Joss Winn and Nick Jackson attended the [parallel] workshop on various JANET, Eduserv and UMF SaaS/cloud storage services.)

Slides from this workshop will be posted online. When they’re available I’ll link to them here.

The tools being discussed were:

1. DAF – the Data Asset Framework (www.data-audit.eu)

  • A methodology for identifying gaps in an institution’s data management practices; designed to help institutions ‘clarify their thinking’ around how they manage research data.
    • N.B. We are already planning to use this methodology within the user requirements analysis workpackage of the Orbital project.
  • DAF arose out of recommendations made in the JISC/UKOLN Dealing with Data report (2007): initially the Data Audit Framework, the name was changed because ‘Audit’ was felt to be off-putting, and not an accurate reflection of what DAF is for – now DAF = Data Asset Framework.
  • “It’s worth looking at the four DAF pilot implementation projects” (carried out in 2008), because there’s likely to be one that has subject-relevance to your #jiscmrd project. The pilot projects found that most HEIs were at a very early stage (lack of RDM infrastructure; an emphasis on needs-scoping).
    • (N.B. the ERIM project at the University of Bath [engineering] used DAF but found it rather daunting and “stopped halfway down the page”(!): since then it has been condensed from a 60-page handbook into a shorter implementation guide. However the Dublin Core-based metadata requirements for datasets in DAF are still rather complex – one suggestion is to “ask fewer questions about more things”: the University of Northampton did something like this; running their own tailored ‘mini-DAF’: broadly following the DAF methodology, but tweaking it to meet their own end and the available resources.)
  • Key points:
    • Speak to lots of people in as many different roles as possible.
    • Use a variety of datagathering techniques (desk research, questionnaires, shadowing researchers, etc.)
    • Ask the DCC for tips!

2. CARDIO (cardio.dcc.ac.uk)

  • A freely-available benchmarking tool, designed to help institutions assess strengths and weaknesses in their RDM infrastructure. Developed out of the IDMP: Integrated Data Management Planning toolkit and support project.
  • Based on a ‘three legged stool’ model’; i.e. a successful RDM infrastructure will be based on three stable ‘legs’: technical infrastructure, appropriate resources (e.g. staff & skills), and commitment from the institution. An imbalance in any of these ‘legs’ leads to unstable RDM. The tool helps institutions to identify short ‘legs’ and plan to improve them. Identifying these imbalances can also be helpful in providing evidence to your institution that further investment needs to be made in a particular area.
  • CARDIO is still effectively in beta, with some tweaks still to make (and perhaps a lack of documentation?) – however some institutions have already found it useful.
  • How it works… a co-ordinator registers with the system and initiates the CARDIO assessments. (“If the scale and nature of your research data holdings isn’t known, run a DAF assessment first.”) CARDIO emails participants and asks them to rate a series of statements relating to their institution’s RDM infrastructure. Only once someone has entered their own ratings are they able to view what other people have put. Takes from 30-60 minutes for a full assessment, though it is possible to target shorter sets of questions at particular groups. CARDIO then automatically generates a [customisable] PDF report complete with charts/visualisations of the data.
  • A shorther, nine-question ‘mini-CARDIO’ is also available: see the latest issue of JISC Inform.

3. DMP Online (dmponline.dcc.ac.uk)

  • A practical, browser-based tool which allows researchers to create and store Data Management Plans (DMPs) for research projects – increasingly, research funders explicity require a DMP (e.g. the Wellcome Trust’s policy on data management).
  • Funder- and institution-specific guidance is provided through the website, along with help (“pointers”) on filling in a DMP. Completed plans can be exported in a number of formats.
  • Researchers may also be interested in the JISC guidance document, How to develop a Data Management and Sharing Plan – complementary to DMP Online.
  • The impression I get is that DMP Online is a tool which will be of practical, day-to-day utility to researchers/groups engaged in funded projects (and to the research offices that support them), whereas the other two tools (DAF/CARDIO) are perhaps aimed more at institutions starting out on the road to developing institutional RDM policies & systems, and/or looking to improve on current practice.
  • Some interesting discussions in the workshop:
    • Can DMP Online be ‘scaled up’ to work at the level of the institution, rather than the individual researcher? (A couple of projects—at UCL and Oxford—are already looking at extending the toolkit to form a more institutional service.)
    • If DMP Online (or other similar tools) make it easier for academics to routinely create DMPs by copying/pasting boilerplate text, is there a danger that writing a DMP becomes a box-ticking exercise (less meaningful/less useful for funders if less consideration given by the researcher)?
    • “Who is qualified to peer-review DMPs!?”

More information and help on using all three of these tools can be got by emailing: info@dcc.ac.uk

Then: a cup of tea, a quick catch-up with some colleagues, and to the road/rails again. I’ll be back tomorrow for day 2.

Let them tweet cake: why Library Camp was unconferencing done right

Posted on October 8th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

I’m on the way back from the first national Library Camp UK in Birmingham (a bit tired after a 4am start. Yep. 4am on a Saturday).

Here are 10 reasons why Library Camp made for a great unconference. In no particular order:

  1. Photo of Library Camp cakeThe people. There were around 200 folk there (at the weekend, remember!), from all sorts of library sectors; plus a really healthy sprinking of non-library folk – from graphic designers to poets. While the echo chamber wasn’t entirely destroyed, it at least cracked in a few places. The passion for libraries was tangible from the start. And it’s probably no coincidence that quite a few Voices for the Library people were in attendance.
  2. The unconferencing. There was no sop to traditional conference programmes, speakers, or presentations. Not a PowerPoint show in sight. All the workshop topics were ‘pitched’ by attendees on the day, scribbled onto post-it notes, and assembled into an impromptu programme on a whiteboard. Folk were free to attend whatever sessions they wanted to get stuck into. For my own part, I took the opportunity to leave my ‘day job’ subjects—open data, repositories, e-resources, etc.—to one side, and took part in some refreshingly non-technological library discussions.
  3. The venue. Etc Venues’ Maple House is <10 mins’ walk from Birmingham New Street station. They let people stick things up on the walls. I think nuff said.
  4. The topic. Mashed Library is about libraries and technology. Cycling for Libraries is about libraries and… er, cycling. Library Camp is about libraries, full stop. Whatever your pet library topic, it was up for discussion.
  5. The tweeting. I think this was the first event I’ve attended where very nearly everyone used Twitter. This was brilliant in building a sense of community in the run up to Library Camp, and on the day the hashtag #libcampuk11 pretty much owned the interwebs.
  6. The democracy. My favourite quote from the day: “leave your perceived status at the door”. I love that “perceived”! No-one was allowed to wear an ‘official’ / institutional badge of library rank. And the internal divisions within library & information work got a good kicking throughout the course of the day. Bravo.
  7. The organisation. Putting a whole new national event together in a few short months is impressive to say the least. Respect is due to @BhamLibrarian@libraryjmac@coralmusgrave@siwhitehouse@timmy666@shedsue, and the sponsors. They’d like to hand the baton on to a totally new group of organisers for Library Camp 2012, so that things are kept fresh and Library Camp is reinvented every year. Will anyone pick it up?
  8. Photo of the Library Camp ideas boardThe city. Alright, Birmingham is a bit of a pain to get to from the depths of rural Lincolnshire (hence my 4am start). But choosing a location in the Midlands did mean that most corners of the UK were represented.
  9. The cake. It was just… beautiful. A stunning variety and a frankly intimidating amount of cakey goodness: nearly all of it home baked with love by Library Camp attendees. And it wasn’t just for show – keeping everyone’s blood sugar levels high meant that people stayed engaged and enthusiastic until the very end of a long day.
  10. Did I mention the people? For a bunch of (according to the stereotype) meek library types*, people weren’t shy about getting stuck in. Without that shared enthusiasm: no unconference.

*Yeah, right. I know. ROFL.

The Library to sponsor developer prize at DevXS

Posted on September 16th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

At the suggestion of the University Librarian Ian Snowley, the University of Lincoln Library are sponsoring a £250 developer prize at the DevXS student developer hackathon in November. The moolah will go to the winners of a library-flavoured developer competition at DevXS, based around the best use of activity data (details tba).

Screenshot of the DevXS website

DevXS is free! It’s open to all undergraduate and postgraduate students, and it’s taking place in Lincoln on the 11th, 12th and 13th of November. Registration is now open. Find out more at devxs.org or by following @devxsconf on Twitter.

Developers Unite!

DevXS is a developer marathon spread across three days, where students from across the UK and beyond are encouraged to team up and build cool things that contribute to university life.

DevXS is about students sharing their ideas, mashing up data and building prototypes that improve, challenge and positively disrupt the research, teaching and learning landscapes of further and higher education.

We’re going to award prizes to the best ideas, prototypes and collaborations and there are going to be developers from universities around the country hanging around to help you out.

Sound awesome? Register now! It’s free!

What I been up to

Posted on July 7th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Apologies: this is one of those generic catch-all blog posts. I attended four separate events last week: here’s a short report from each one.

~~~

Kimberlin1. CILIP UC&R Members’ Day: Making an Impact

De Montfort University, Leicester. 28 June, 2011

This workshop for CILIP members was looking at various ways in which libraries can have (and can measure) their ‘impact’. I spoke first about Lincoln’s involvement in the University of Huddersfield’s Library Impact Data Project (LIDP), and how that project is trying (successfully, it seems) to measure the relationship between students’ library use and their degree ‘success’.

Then DMU subject librarian Jason Eyre talked about his PITSTOP project, which built a mediated forum for online discussion between Social Work students on placement, their lecturers, and their practice educators (in the NHS and local authorities). Jason explained that while the online discussion forum itself was not very well used, the impact of the project was that is acted as a catalyst for building a better relationship between students, academics, practice educators, and the library.

After a very well-run World Café session, where we moved around between different tables, each themed with a different aspect of ‘impact’ in libraries – and then lunch, information management consultant David Streatfield presented on the difficulties of measuring and evaluating the impact that academic libraries can have. He outlined some of the different approaches that have been taken in the past, and how those approaches can be less than successful in an environment of government pressure to control public service provision.

Lastly, Maria Cotera, former president of the CILIP Career Development Group, told us several anecdotes about the ways she has seen library workers make an impact themselves, through their involvement in staff development, social, and extra-professional activities. In an exercise, all the delegates came up with an example of a shared pressure or circumstance in our home institutions that could be turned into an opportunity for staff development.

Thanks to Marie Nicholson and the UC&R East Midlands committee for inviting me to speak! Twitter hashtag: #UCREMimpact.

~~~

Great Central Icehouse2. EMALINK event on collection development

University of Lincoln. 29 June, 2011

This was another East Midlands event, and the first EMALINK event held in Lincoln since we joined that network. It was organised, jointly, by the University of Lincoln, our neighbours Bishop Grosseteste University College, and Nottingham Trent University (NTU). The theme was the lifecycle of collection management: from selection and acquisition, through analysis and review of collections, and finally disposal.

NTU kicked off with a look at their work to incorporate Talis Aspire into the DNA of their library: they’re building a set of resource selection and allocation processes that are strongly driven by the resource lists built by academics using Aspire. Lincoln responded with two short presentations about collection analysis: our project to compare the strengths and weaknesses (in size, breadth, and age) of the various subject collections in our physical bookstock with the relative sizes of the student body in different subject areas; and our work to determine value for money in ‘Big Deal’ database subscriptions. Finally, Susan Rodda from Bishop Grosseteste talked about the options for disposing of unwanted physical library stock, and how BG have managed, for several years, to weed their collection without sending any paper to landfill.

~~~

Goodenough library (detail)3. JISC Managing Research Data Programme (#jiscmrd) community briefing event

Goodenough College, London. 1 July, 2011

On Friday, I attended this briefing event for the current JISC research data funding call for proposals, on Joss Winn‘s behalf. The JISC programme manager ran through the requirements and expectations for the various strands of this current call. Kevin Ashley of the Digital Curation Centre also presented: about how the DCC can support and work with institutions who are running research data management projects. See hashtag: #jiscmrd for information about the programme.

~~~

OU Library4. JISC Innovations in Activity Data workshop

The Open University, Milton Keynes. 4 July, 2011

After a long, Sunday-afternoon train journey to Milton Keynes, I paid my first ever visit to the OU’s Walton Hall campus for another activity data-related event, this time organised and hosted by the team behind the JISC-funded RISE (“Recommendations Improve the Search Experience”) project.

The day began with three presentations from projects funded under the current JISC activity data strand:

  1. Joy Palmer of MIMAS and the SALT project (“Surfacing the Academic Long Tail”: MIMAS working with the John Rylands University Library of the University of Manchester);
  2. RISE themselves (Richard Nurse of the OU) talking about how they are using EZProxy log data to power a recommendation service (“…users who looked at this, also looked at these…“);
  3. Via video link, live from Huddersfield: Dave Pattern talking about LIDP.

Then, another World Café-type exercise (two in one week!). We moved about the room, scribbling on the tablecloths, making notes about: [a] what activity data universities have at their disposal; [b] what use we might put it to; and [c] what barriers are in our way.

In the afternoon: two more presentations. The OU’s Tony Hirst (a.k.a. @psychemedia), rattling and rambling through various techniques for visualising activity data. This is really valuable stuff… what I’m less clear about is: where’s the first rung of the dataviz ladder? How does a muggle start thinking about data visualisation? Tony says that many of the techniques he writes about are things he “didn’t know how to do a couple of hours before…“, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest of us will find them as easy to pick up! Tony’s coming to Lincoln soon, so I’m going to try and talk to him about data visualisation a bit more then.

Last of all, David Kay (of SERO and the JISC activity data Synthesis Project: kind of an umbrella for all of these separate activity data initiatives) summed things up nicely: including an excellent slide listing the kinds of skills library workers are going to have to develop in order to do justice to activity data: including data visualisation, again! I’ll post that slide here, if and when I can find it.

There was a little bit of activity on Twitter for this workshop: look for the hashtag #iad11.

~~~