Posts Tagged ‘CILIP’

UKCoRR: winners of the 2011 UKeIG Jason Farradane award

Posted on November 22nd, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Screenshot of the UKCoRR websiteReported here:

“The 2011 UKeiG Jason Farradane Award has been awarded to the United Kingdom Council of Research Repositories (UKCoRR). Founded in 2007, UKCoRR is a professional membership-driven organisation managed for and by those staff working throughout the UK as Open Access repository administrators and managers.”

The Jason Farradane award is “made by UKeiG to an individual or a group of people in recognition of outstanding contribution to the information profession“. UKeiG are the UK e-Information Group, a more-than-usually-autonomous special interest group of CILIP.

In other news, we’ve finally managed to get the new UKCoRR website launched. You can see it for yourself, at:

Why I’ve (re-)joined CILIP

Posted on September 12th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Cilip officeIn counterpoint to my last blog post, and so I don’t leave the lasting impression that I’m some sort of curmudgeonly hyperindividualist…

I’ve recently joined CILIP, the ‘Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals’. It’s the professional body for librarians. I was a student member while I was doing my MSc,  but I dropped my membership as soon as I graduated (i.e. as soon as I became liable for full members’ fees!), so I’m counting this as my first period of ‘proper’ membership.

Other people have given quite coherent accounts of why they’ve recently resigned their membership of CILIP, and as an organisation it does take a fair bit of flak from its current, ex-, and potential members. So why have I signed up, and why now?

  1. I couldn’t justify the membership cost a couple of years ago; now I can better afford it.
  2. The odd grumpy blog post aside, I’m quite a sociable sort, and I enjoy participating in groups of interesting people who share my interests.
  3. I now know (i/r/l or via Twitter) a few|of the|people involved in running CILIP. They’re good people. I’m sure there have always been good people involved in CILIP, but I didn’t know them then. See? Logic.
  4. And now when I don’t agree with how CILIP is run, I get a say in changing it for the better.
  5. I can save my employer some money on training courses, often discounted for members, which might mean I’ll get to go on more of them.
  6. It’s better to be inside the boat than outside, when it’s stormy (or ruder versions of the same proverb).

But did I join CILIP for the job alerts, magazine/newsletter, current awareness, networking opportunities, practical training, conferences, etc.? Probably not. I can have my needs met on the Internet for all of those things, more quickly and with less mess. So to speak.

And did I join for the opportunity to become professionally certified?

I… haven’t decided yet. Convince me.

What I been up to

Posted on July 7th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Apologies: this is one of those generic catch-all blog posts. I attended four separate events last week: here’s a short report from each one.

~~~

Kimberlin1. CILIP UC&R Members’ Day: Making an Impact

De Montfort University, Leicester. 28 June, 2011

This workshop for CILIP members was looking at various ways in which libraries can have (and can measure) their ‘impact’. I spoke first about Lincoln’s involvement in the University of Huddersfield’s Library Impact Data Project (LIDP), and how that project is trying (successfully, it seems) to measure the relationship between students’ library use and their degree ‘success’.

Then DMU subject librarian Jason Eyre talked about his PITSTOP project, which built a mediated forum for online discussion between Social Work students on placement, their lecturers, and their practice educators (in the NHS and local authorities). Jason explained that while the online discussion forum itself was not very well used, the impact of the project was that is acted as a catalyst for building a better relationship between students, academics, practice educators, and the library.

After a very well-run World Café session, where we moved around between different tables, each themed with a different aspect of ‘impact’ in libraries – and then lunch, information management consultant David Streatfield presented on the difficulties of measuring and evaluating the impact that academic libraries can have. He outlined some of the different approaches that have been taken in the past, and how those approaches can be less than successful in an environment of government pressure to control public service provision.

Lastly, Maria Cotera, former president of the CILIP Career Development Group, told us several anecdotes about the ways she has seen library workers make an impact themselves, through their involvement in staff development, social, and extra-professional activities. In an exercise, all the delegates came up with an example of a shared pressure or circumstance in our home institutions that could be turned into an opportunity for staff development.

Thanks to Marie Nicholson and the UC&R East Midlands committee for inviting me to speak! Twitter hashtag: #UCREMimpact.

~~~

Great Central Icehouse2. EMALINK event on collection development

University of Lincoln. 29 June, 2011

This was another East Midlands event, and the first EMALINK event held in Lincoln since we joined that network. It was organised, jointly, by the University of Lincoln, our neighbours Bishop Grosseteste University College, and Nottingham Trent University (NTU). The theme was the lifecycle of collection management: from selection and acquisition, through analysis and review of collections, and finally disposal.

NTU kicked off with a look at their work to incorporate Talis Aspire into the DNA of their library: they’re building a set of resource selection and allocation processes that are strongly driven by the resource lists built by academics using Aspire. Lincoln responded with two short presentations about collection analysis: our project to compare the strengths and weaknesses (in size, breadth, and age) of the various subject collections in our physical bookstock with the relative sizes of the student body in different subject areas; and our work to determine value for money in ‘Big Deal’ database subscriptions. Finally, Susan Rodda from Bishop Grosseteste talked about the options for disposing of unwanted physical library stock, and how BG have managed, for several years, to weed their collection without sending any paper to landfill.

~~~

Goodenough library (detail)3. JISC Managing Research Data Programme (#jiscmrd) community briefing event

Goodenough College, London. 1 July, 2011

On Friday, I attended this briefing event for the current JISC research data funding call for proposals, on Joss Winn‘s behalf. The JISC programme manager ran through the requirements and expectations for the various strands of this current call. Kevin Ashley of the Digital Curation Centre also presented: about how the DCC can support and work with institutions who are running research data management projects. See hashtag: #jiscmrd for information about the programme.

~~~

OU Library4. JISC Innovations in Activity Data workshop

The Open University, Milton Keynes. 4 July, 2011

After a long, Sunday-afternoon train journey to Milton Keynes, I paid my first ever visit to the OU’s Walton Hall campus for another activity data-related event, this time organised and hosted by the team behind the JISC-funded RISE (“Recommendations Improve the Search Experience”) project.

The day began with three presentations from projects funded under the current JISC activity data strand:

  1. Joy Palmer of MIMAS and the SALT project (“Surfacing the Academic Long Tail”: MIMAS working with the John Rylands University Library of the University of Manchester);
  2. RISE themselves (Richard Nurse of the OU) talking about how they are using EZProxy log data to power a recommendation service (“…users who looked at this, also looked at these…“);
  3. Via video link, live from Huddersfield: Dave Pattern talking about LIDP.

Then, another World Café-type exercise (two in one week!). We moved about the room, scribbling on the tablecloths, making notes about: [a] what activity data universities have at their disposal; [b] what use we might put it to; and [c] what barriers are in our way.

In the afternoon: two more presentations. The OU’s Tony Hirst (a.k.a. @psychemedia), rattling and rambling through various techniques for visualising activity data. This is really valuable stuff… what I’m less clear about is: where’s the first rung of the dataviz ladder? How does a muggle start thinking about data visualisation? Tony says that many of the techniques he writes about are things he “didn’t know how to do a couple of hours before…“, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest of us will find them as easy to pick up! Tony’s coming to Lincoln soon, so I’m going to try and talk to him about data visualisation a bit more then.

Last of all, David Kay (of SERO and the JISC activity data Synthesis Project: kind of an umbrella for all of these separate activity data initiatives) summed things up nicely: including an excellent slide listing the kinds of skills library workers are going to have to develop in order to do justice to activity data: including data visualisation, again! I’ll post that slide here, if and when I can find it.

There was a little bit of activity on Twitter for this workshop: look for the hashtag #iad11.

~~~

I’ll be making an impact in Leicester tomorrow

Posted on June 27th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

I’m at De Montfort University in Leicester tomorrow, giving a presentation at the CILIP UC&R East Midlands members’ event: Making an Impact. My presentation is about our involvement in the JISC-funded Library Impact Data Project (LIDP) with the University of Huddersfield. My slides are online.

If you want to skip the monkey and head straight for the organ-grinders, my presentation borrows fairly heavily from two documents produced by the LIDP project team at Huddersfield:

10 practical & accessible library technology blogs

Posted on June 17th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

Here are ten of the best practical library tech blogs that I follow. They’re all about technology (ish), but they’re not geeky or inaccessible. Most but not all, are written by people in of UK Higher Education libraries. In case you want to subscribe to them en masse, I’ve bundled them up into an OPML file which you should be able to import into a feed reader (e.g. Google Reader).

Q. Have you got a good library technology blog? Care to share?

  1. Copac Developments
    What’s happening behind the scenes at Copac
  2. Electronic Resources Blog
    Library Services, University of Huddersfield
  3. eLibrary
    eLibrary team, Birmingham City University
  4. Fulup’s blog
    A librarian at De Montfort University
  5. Musings around librarianship
    Aaron Tay, a librarian at the National University of Singapore
  6. NewT Bham – where technology and libraries meet
    New Technologies Group at the University of Birmingham Library
  7. Phil Bradley’s Weblog
    Internet consultant and (2011) CILIP Vice-president
  8. ResourceShelf ResourceBlog
    We find the sources; you get the credit!
  9. “Self-plagiarism is style” – Dave Pattern’s blog
    Library Systems Manager at the University of Huddersfield
  10. UoL Library Blog – develop, debate, innovate
    University of Leicester

LIDP / “Making an Impact” event, 28th June, Leicester

Posted on June 14th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

I’m speaking at a CILIP UC&R East Midlands members’ event called “Making an Impact“, on Tuesday, 28 June, at De Montfort University in Leicester, about our involvement in Huddersfield’s JISC-funded Library Impact Data Project (LIDP).

Making an impact: The JISC Library Impact Data Project

Paul Stainthorp will give an overview of the JISC-funded Library Impact Data Project (LIDP). This project, led by the University of Huddersfield, is testing the hypothesis that there is ‘a statistically significant correlation across a number of universities between library activity data and student attainment’. To do this, the team is gathering and analysing library activity data (book loans, gate count figures, e-resource accesses, PC logins) from eight UK university libraries, and comparing that data with student attainment. Paul is the electronic resources librarian at the University of Lincoln and currently project manager for the JISC-funded resource discovery project ‘Jerome’.

How commercial next-generation library discovery tools have *nearly* got it right

Posted on May 17th, 2011 by Paul Stainthorp

In Huddersfield (again – I’m barely away from the place!), yesterday, at a CILIP UC&R (University, College and Research Group) Yorkshire & Humberside [catchy name] training event on ‘Discovering Discovery Tools‘. Librarians from four different UK universities gave practical, pros-and-cons descriptions of how they implemented and are now running four different commercial next-gen resource-discovery tools:

Five (count ‘em!) people from Lincoln were in the audience. I was wearing two hats: one for project Jerome for thinking about design concepts in resource discovery tools; the other for my day job – Lincoln is in the middle of a strategic review of Library ICT systems, which may well end up recommending that we buy one of these products.

It was all good stuff. First off, libraries need to hear the honest, warts and all counterpoint to the glowing terms in which each discovery product is described by its vendor. Secondly, it’s useful to subject all four* resource discovery platforms to the same amount of daylight, and see where the common problems lie, as well as where one tool outperforms another. Thirdly—and even though there’s a lot of resource discovery hyperbole to be heard—this is still a big shift for academic libraries, and I think we should discuss implications that are wider than the costs/benefits for an individual institution.

(*Yes, I know there are a few other tools. But they weren’t in the room yesterday.)

Lockside
What’s stopping us? (Canal lock gate at the University of Huddersfield.)

Things that jumped out at me:

Commercial resource discovery has reached a level of maturity that was absent a couple of years ago. That’s not to say that all next-gen resource discovery tools are perfect (because they aren’t), or that there aren’t any problems (because there are; see below), but academic libraries do now have a genuine choice between several different, viable commercial products.

Here’s a heresy: the differences between these four products are not that significant. I think that anyone who went away from yesterday’s event thinking that out of the four discovery tools on display there are some ‘good’ and some ‘bad’ …is probably wrong. It’s not really about the product, it’s about the willingness of the vendor to overcome problems, and about their attitude to their customers. Do you buy a slightly-less slick product, but from a company you feel you can have a more productive relationship with?

In fact, most of the real problems with resource discovery seem to be common to all four of the products on show yesterday. De-duping via FRBR reckons to be a bit of an Achilles’ heel. (A shame. FRBRisation is one of those things you either need to get right, or not do at all. A half-arsed attempt is worse than not bothering.)

Also broken: known-item search. This ought to be trivial to fix, and it needs to be sorted now now now.  I find it particularly sinister that some commercial resource-discovery tools rank their search results according to secret, proprietary algorithms that can’t be inspected or challenged by their users, let alone altered/improved. This is a problem. What’s the point of a library that can’t justify how its resource discovery system actually works? Are we just here to sign the cheques?

Libraries still have a tendency to overcomplicate things for their users. Sometimes they do this because they have no choice (perhaps their shiny new discovery tool doesn’t quite work they way it should); but often they seem just too ready to accept a situation where users are inconvenienced sooner than address an underlying problem. Lincoln included in this sweeping generalisation.

There’s no point pretending that a library can make two independent decisions to purchase [a] a next-gen resource discovery platform, and [b] a journals knowledgebase/link resolver. The two things are all tied up together. To pick a random example: you want Summon, you’d better want 360.

Why can’t we just buy access to a search index? If I want to pay to provide my users with the benefits of a lovely big central index of content, why do I have to buy into your discovery algorithm and web front-end as well? (Whither JISC collections?)

Related, and finally – we really shouldn’t have to replace our search and discovery interfaces every time we want/need to use a different content provider, and we shouldn’t be placed in the situation of having to make collection/subscription decisions in order to ‘feed’ our discovery tool. It may be temptingly easy, cost aside, to pick up and put down different next-gen discovery products (“…it’s just a subscription!”) but there’s too much at stake for our users.

The champagne lifestyle of the librarian

Posted on August 20th, 2010 by Paul Stainthorp

Press cutting from CILIP Library + Information Gazette, 12 August 2010; photo from 2CQR’s 21st birthday celebrations. We were there to talk about the University’s purchase and installation of 2CQR’s new RFID “Totem” self-service machines.

Ram Patel of 2CQR (centre) with 2CQR's first-ever client and representatives from new client the University of Lincoln.